Literacy
These are the families Clarity screens. They describe what language can do—not who someone is. Each card has a pressure example and a benign lookalike so you can see why a single phrase is never enough.
Clarity cannot read tone, culture, sarcasm, or relationship history. A match is a prompt to look closer, not a finding of abuse or intent.
Care or loyalty used as currency—so a boundary or delay feels like proof you do not care enough.
“If you really cared about me, you wouldn't need time to think.”
“I care about you and understand that you need time. There is no pressure to answer today.”
Cannot conclude: that the speaker is a manipulator, or that you must stay or leave.
Try a related example in AnalyzeA compressed decision window so agreement happens before you can think, check facts, or consult others.
“I need an answer immediately. This is your last chance before it is too late.”
“I need an answer by Friday so I can make plans, but it is completely okay to say no.”
Cannot conclude: that every deadline is coercive. Logistics and real emergencies also use time language.
Try a related example in AnalyzeCooperation linked to a stated or implied penalty—making honesty or refusal feel risky.
“If you don't do this I will leave and never speak to you. You will regret it.”
“If you are not ready, we can skip it. I will not punish you for saying no.”
Cannot conclude: that you are in danger. Harm language takes the safety path, which is also not an assessment.
Discourages outside perspective—positioning support networks as threats, or secrecy as required.
“Don't tell anyone. I'm the only one who understands you.”
“Please do not tell anyone about the surprise party until Maya arrives.”
Cannot conclude: that secrecy is always harmful. Passwords, gifts, and medical privacy also use “don't tell.”
Challenges your memory, perception, or emotional response instead of engaging what you experienced.
“You're imagining things. That never happened. You're too sensitive.”
“I remember it differently. Can we walk through what each of us heard?”
Cannot conclude: a clinical “gaslighting” diagnosis. Disagreement about facts is not automatically this function.
Turns a moment into a permanent rule—always, never, everyone, nobody—so nuance feels impossible.
“You always do this. You never consider me. Nobody else would put up with you.”
“Everyone is invited, and nobody is required to participate.”
Cannot conclude: much from a single “always.” These words are low-specificity; Clarity keeps one hook in the Low band.
A request reframed as duty—you should, you must, you have to—so compliance feels mandatory.
“After everything I've done, you have to make this right. It is your responsibility.”
“You should talk to a lawyer before signing so you understand your legal rights.”
Cannot conclude: that advice from a doctor, employer, or friend is manipulation. This family is easy to over-flag.
Try a related example in AnalyzeShrinks or ridicules your response to close the topic—implying the problem is your reaction.
“You're being dramatic. It's not that bad. Calm down.”
“This delay is not that bad for the project if we still ship Friday. Take a breath with me.”
Cannot conclude: that asking someone to calm down is always this function. Context decides.
Pulling back or giving up while leaving the rupture unresolved—often inviting you to chase or repair.
“Fine, forget it. I'm done trying.”
“Fine with me if we postpone. I am easy either way.”
Cannot conclude: that every “fine” is a tactic. People also withdraw because they are tired.
Try a related example in AnalyzeA negative conclusion about your value or place, stated indirectly—inviting you to disprove it.
“I guess I know where I stand. Obviously I don't matter enough.”
“I guess dinner is at seven unless you would rather do eight.”
Cannot conclude: the speaker's true feelings, or that you must immediately reassure them.
Warmth, contact, or access offered or withheld based on your behavior.
“Don't bother contacting me unless you apologize and prove you care.”
“I will not visit unless you invite me. I will respect your space.”
Cannot conclude: that a boundary (“don't call tonight”) is the same as a loyalty test.
Your limits—time, energy, a no—framed as the cause of the speaker's hurt.
“If you don't have time for me you obviously don't care.”
“If you don't have time this week, tell me and we will pick another day.”
Cannot conclude: that the speaker's hurt is fake. Feelings can be real and still not be your assignment.
If you have a message you are authorized to review, Clarity can highlight these functions in the text. The band is experimental. You keep the meaning.
Analyze a message → Read the method